amanico[JLC Moderator]
344530
Jaeger Lecoultre Master Chronograph Sector Dial, the true story behind the watch.
Sep 28, 2017,07:04 AM
At the SIHH this year, Jaeger Lecoultre unveiled three new versions from the Master Line, the Master Control, the Master Géographique, and the Master Chronograph, to celebrate the 25th anniversary of this family.
Three new versions, let's say in a more accurate way, three new dials, with less functions for the Chronograph ( two sub dials instead of three ) and the the Géographique ( date and power reserve indicator ), at a lower price.
When I discovered them, I wondered if the Manufacture imagined this dial for this threesome or if they referred to something belonging to their past.
I asked to see these three watches again, and to discuss that with the Heritage Gallery.
And... There is something to be shared!
Jaeger Lecoultre clearly took the inspiration for this pocket watch, which is a chronograph... A Rattrapante, from the 40's, housing a Valjoux movement.
It was a surprise for me, as I can guess that it is a surprise for you, now.
We are very close to the dial of the pocket watch, with the Master Chronograph. Even the blue tachymeter is here. As well as the Two Tone dial.
Here are some fresh and better pictures I took at the Manufacture.
I absolutely love the 2 sub dials configuration, but I regret the pointed skeleton and empty hands. I would have much preferred the leaf hands of the pocket watch, much more elegant, from my point of view.
Here is a side by side picture, to better show you the ressemblance...
Of course, you will find the Cal 751 beating inside, which is automatic. Less sexy than a manual winding one, but much more affordable than a manual winding Rattrapante.
Needless to say that among the three sector dials unveiled this year, the Chronograph is my favorite. The Master Control Date would have been my first choice if it didn't have this date which ruins, in my opinion, the visual outcome.
Too bad, indeed, since this is, in my opinion, a good looking dial we have here. Another detail, the word automatic, which was not necessary, in my opinion, but not at the point to be a deal breaker.
Looking forward to reading your comments and thoughts,
Best.
Nicolas